A pervasive problem for some in contemporary society splits us into two camps. They read the same things you do. They take wildly different views of what those writings mean. They are not easily persuaded by reason or the advice of experts. They acknowledge legal obligations, but still want to “do their own thing,” often to the detriment of others they engage with.
You know who I am talking about...Unrestrained buyers who ask for the sun, the moon and all the stars based on property inspections – without regard to the terms of their inspection contingency or as-is contract.
Sellers expect buyers to abide by inspection contingency terms of the contract they (the buyers) offered. If the deal is “as is,” sellers expect not to hear a thing. If there are “asks” they better be significant problems. Our contracts are all pretty clear about what is and is not allowed.
But as one drafter on the 7.0 committee acknowledges “the heart wants what it wants.” If the buyer wants something fixed, it matters not what the contract says. Whether it is a “major material defect” or “safety issue.” That buyers promised they wouldn’t ask for anything. That the seller does not want to be “nickled and dimed.” These buyers are going to ask for whatever they want to ask for.
Some professionals on the other sides of our deals make the problem worse, reimagining “as is” clauses to allow asks for “major material defects and safety issues.” Distorting understanding of the baseline contingency clauses to have no limitations at all. These enablers inject a viral disregard of contract terms into the community. Encouraging buyers to ask for anything they desire and then blindly relaying whatever requests clients direct them to make. They use up all of our resources and expose us all to run-away negotiations. Not only on the deal at hand. Super-spreaders of mis-information encouraging others to behave badly too.
We choose a different course. We – and our broker partners - advise our clients about contract limitations. We encourage clients to toe the line. Not all will be convinced here. In the end, the buyer decides whether or not a deal makes financial sense. If it does not, we may have no choice but to ask for concessions. Sometimes we really do need to ask for - or to grant otherwise questionable concessions to keep a deal moving forward. But we stand behind the spirit and intent of written contract contingencies and encourage our colleagues to do so too.